Highlights from interesting research or insightful analysis, particularly in the areas of policy, strategy, economics, agriculture and governance
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 16, 2017
Is coal still cheaper than renewables as an energy source?
Coal-fired power is only cheaper than renewable energy where the capital cost of the plant is sunk. For new power facilities, renewables is already cheaper. A factcheck by Ken Baldwin (ANU) Dylan McConnell (Uni Melbelbourne) and Tony Wood (Grattan Institute)in The Conversation runs through the numbers.
Labels:
economics,
infrastructure
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Monday, June 12, 2017
Is Australia's economy really a world-beater?
The claim that Australia has gone twenty-six years without a recession is true, but only if you accept three assumptions. Unfortunately, none of them has any official or intellectual basis. Tim Colebatch explains in Inside Story that that economics has no accepted definition of a recession. In public debate, the gap has been filled by the silly measure journalists love to use: a recession occurs when seasonally adjusted GDP goes backwards for two quarters.
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
Tax on ‘unearned gains’ is the missing piece of the affordable housing puzzle
Extending capital gains taxation to cover annual improvements in land value would improve discourage housing speculation and improve housing affordability. Brian Feeney (University of Queensland) explains.
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Thursday, May 4, 2017
The government is swimming against the tide on Westpac’s Adani decision
No one is going to make even short-term profits out of the Adani coal mine, with its huge upfront capital investment, unless they get a substantial subsidy from the taxpayer. And the long-term prospects look grim. David Peetz and Georgina Murray (Griffith University) explain that those who argue that Westpac’s decision was “illogical” are swimming against both the financial and technological tides.
Labels:
economics,
financial sector,
fiscal policy,
infrastructure,
policy,
politics
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
WA’s economic mismanagement is not a reason to review how the GST is carved up
The questions in the terms of reference, that the Treasurer has given to the Productivity Commission, were answered almost five years ago by a similar inquiry, which found many of the concerns about the current system were overstated. And, contrary to the Treasurer’s insinuation that “the current approach of horizontal fiscal equalisation creates disincentives for reform”, the previous inquiry concluded there was not enough evidence of efficiency losses in the economy. Saul Easlake (University of Tasmania) explains.
Labels:
economics,
federalism,
fiscal policy,
policy,
politics,
redistribution
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Tuesday, March 28, 2017
Houses aren’t more unaffordable for first home buyers, but they are riskier
Comparisons of housing affordability typically compare the ratio of house prices to incomes - ignoring interest rates, which have a greater impact on changes in affordability. Jamie Alcock (University of Sydney) explains.
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Monday, February 27, 2017
Business investment is weak, but an unfunded company tax cut won’t fix it
The overwhelming reason why companies undertake investment is to exploit market opportunities for the goods and services that the investment supports. Cutting the rate of company tax can lead to a marginal increase in the after-tax rate of return of an investment - but only if the project is profitable in the first place, and that depends on demand and broader economic growth.
Because of dividend imputation in Australia, the role of company tax in influencing investment decision is even more marginal than in other countries - it is mostly only foreign shareholders that would benefit from a cut in Australia's company tax rate.
Labels:
economics,
fiscal policy,
policy,
productivity,
reforms,
taxation
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Thursday, February 2, 2017
What economists and tax experts think of the company tax cut
In a perfectly stylised model of the economy, a company tax rate reduction to 25% could be expected to deliver modest economic gains. But the evidence overwhelmingly rejects such a notion. Jenni Henderson (The Conversation) explains why Australia's leading economists disagree with the Government's economic justifications for a company tax rate cut.
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
More equal societies perform better
Australia is not the egalitarian nation that many people think it is. Rather, in terms of wealth inequalities, we’re mid-ranking on the international league table and we’re becoming more unequal. Frank Stilwell (University of Sydney) explains why that matters and the role that reintroduction of an inheritance tax might play.
Labels:
economics,
equity,
policy,
politics,
redistribution,
reforms,
social policy,
taxation
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Friday, October 14, 2016
Government needs to consider policies that boost private demand for goods and services
Reuben Finighan (University of Melbourne) argues that the Treasurer’s comments show some understanding of the challenges presented by the new low-rate era, but the policies he promotes do not. Taking money from welfare and sending it to corporations risks increasing corporate saving while reducing consumer demand – the exact opposite of what is needed.
Labels:
economics,
fiscal policy,
monetary policy,
OECD,
policy
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Wednesday, August 31, 2016
The evidence is against ‘bigger is better’ for local government
Brian Dollery (University of New England) explains that the financial performance of local authorities does not improve as advocates of amalgamation contend. On the contrary, amalgamated municipalities often perform worse than their unmerged counterparts.
Labels:
economics,
local government,
policy,
politics,
reforms
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Wednesday, August 3, 2016
A comparison of monetary and fiscal expansion
Phil Lewis (University of Canberra) compares the options available to stimulate a sluggish economy.
Labels:
economics,
fiscal policy,
monetary policy
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
For the English, Brexit will mean economic and political pain
Stephen King (Monash University) explains that the EU leaders have a strong incentive to make the UK's ‘exit conditions’ as onerous and costly as possible – so as to deter other nations from also exiting the EU. Incentives for Scotland and Northern Ireland to stay with the EU will figure prominently and the remaining England and Wales are likely to face the highest level of default restrictions on trade with the EU (including with Scotland and Northern Ireland). Great Britain is likely to disintegrate rapidly over the next two years and the standard of living will decline, particularly in the midlands and northern parts of England.
Labels:
economics,
international relations,
politics
Location:
Canberra ACT, Australia
Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Childcare policies compared
Ben Phillips (Australian National University), writing in The Conversation, compares Labor's childcare policy with that of the Coalition. Each party seems locked into a vicious cycle of increasing subsidies only to see prices increase more and parents worse off except in the short term.
Labels:
economics,
policy,
social policy
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Friday, April 22, 2016
Company tax cut only advantages foreign investors!
Janine Dixon (Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University) writes in The Conversation that it’s easy to see why a company tax cut polarises opinion, as it generates clear winners and losers. Foreign investors will receive a windfall gain at the expense of Australian residents.
Editor's note: Finally, an economic modeller who understands how Australia's company tax system works! My only quibble is the analysis seems to ignore the effect of company tax on retained earnings and also double taxation agreements. Retained earnings complicate the imputation credit story. DTAs work a little bit like the imputation system, so foreign investors from most countries who pay their taxes will likely be worse off, similar to Australian investors. Foreign investors who avoid paying taxes through sophisticated offshore arrangements are the big winners from a company tax cut.
Editor's note: Finally, an economic modeller who understands how Australia's company tax system works! My only quibble is the analysis seems to ignore the effect of company tax on retained earnings and also double taxation agreements. Retained earnings complicate the imputation credit story. DTAs work a little bit like the imputation system, so foreign investors from most countries who pay their taxes will likely be worse off, similar to Australian investors. Foreign investors who avoid paying taxes through sophisticated offshore arrangements are the big winners from a company tax cut.
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
Budget explainer: the problem with measuring productivity
Gerard de Valence (University of Technology Sydney) explains in The Conversation that Government policies can support improved productivity, if they are well designed and implemented. However, many current policy settings were put in place when we had an industrial economy and are not really suited to the emerging post-industrial economy of the 21st century.
Labels:
economics,
productivity
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Removing negative gearing on property would hurt low income renters
Ross Guest (Griffith University) explains in The Conversation that if we restricted the tax advantages of negative gearing we would dampen investor demand for housing which would slow house price growth in Sydney and everywhere else. But at what cost? It would be tougher to rent a property, hurting low income households. We need to be clear about what problem we are trying to fix and consider whether there are better ways of doing it.
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
China’s 6.9% GDP growth rate is not the hard landing feared
James Laurenceson (University of Technology Sydney) writes in The Conversation that economic data point to a Chinese economy that is following the same path towards high income status travelled earlier by neighbours such as Korea. And, while the resources price boom may be over, the rise of China’s middle class (expected to grow by 850 million by 2030) is still the best news that the Australian economy has.
Labels:
economics,
forecasting
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Was the housing boom in Sydney and Melbourne driven by foreign buyers?
Ross Guest and Nicholas Rohde (Griffith University) explain in The Conversation that foreign investment was only a minor factor in the decade long boom in Sydney and Melbourne and housing affordability.
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Thursday, December 17, 2015
Interest rates could stay low for decades
Rodney Maddock (Monash University) writes in The Conversation that saving has tended to increase and investment to fall; more money is available but fewer people want to borrow, thus driving down rates. The trends will not likely change abruptly so we can expect low rates for a long time.
Labels:
economics,
monetary policy
Location:
Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)